by galled » Thu Apr 28, 2016 9:26 pm
Point 1: It could be argued that it might take someone who won't do things the same old, same old to get things moving again. If you're part of the political system for decades, you probably lack new ideas. So, having no political experience could be a good thing.
Point 2: Bankruptcy is good or bad depending on which side you're on. There have been many companies that emerged from bankruptcy, paid all of their creditors, and are fine today. I don't know of any specifics of Trump's bankruptcies (and I don't even know if he was in control of any of them when they did file). The devil is in the details, so I can't pass judgement without specifics, but in general, bankruptcies are designed to pay off creditors. They may have all been paid off or they may not. It depends. Details make a huge difference. Then there have been many companies that went bankrupt after many years of doing great things and being profitable for most of them. Again, it depends on specifics.
Regardless, voting has denigrated to a contest of voting for the least objectionable candidate. It's looking like it'll be Trump and Hillary this cycle.