2 companies sued 2 companies
One settled out of court
It was over whether the defendant caused lead contamination on the plaintiffs' properties.
The defendant was a glass manufacturer who made lead glass for light bulbs.
It started in 1952 by the name of the defendant who settled and was sold to the other defendant in 1983. Lead was prominently used up through the '70's, and maybe some of the '80's. Things like leaded gas, lead paint, etc. The plaintiffs also included 5 residents, saying that they were unable to use their lawn because of the potential contamination.
Now, the defendant's business closed in 2011. The lawsuit was filed in 2013. The statute of limitation in my state is 5 years. These places were build during the time period where lead was used in a lot of stuff. The plaintiffs LIVED there during those times. They have no plans to move out, despite their fear of health risks. There's a neighboring college who has no complaints, and where there's a college, there's a sports field.
Just the fact they waited til they were out if business for 2 years sets off red flags.
They couldn't prove to us jurors that the defendant caused the lead contamination. They bring up the state of repair to machines in the building, but it looked as if the defendant did what they could do.
The plaintiff's lawyer asked 1001 questions, even at one point asking the same question multiple times despite the judge telling him to move on (this is actually the reason why I wanted to scream). They had like 20 witnesses and took like 8 hours on most of the expert witnesses.
The defendant had maybe 5 or 6 and they didn't spend a lot of time. But the plaintiff spent MORE time on cross-examination than the defendant did on questioning defence witnesses. It shouldn't have lasted this long. It was a waste of time.
The plaintiff argued with the witness, made sparky remarks, and just was unprofessional all around. Would assume that his wording is the problem when an objection arose even though that's not the problem, he didn't want to discuss it.
Lesson to be learned: the more isn't always the merrier. Sometimes less is better.
Us jurors had a hard time staying awake because of how hard it was to follow along.
The defense won.